I take it that means you don't have any logical arguments against my points above then.
No, I have plenty but I can't really be bothered arguing the point I've argued so many times before. It's a bit pointless really, having discussions like this with people who aren't really interested in another point of view.
Precisely. I enjoy discussing politics and society on this board, but whenever you post, Paul, I already know what to expect: a link to a story from
The Daily Mail with a biased report on some government policy followed by a mild to moderate rant about the incompetence or greed of the government.
It doesn't matter whether the issue is an important one (improper use of surveillance laws) or a stupid one (EU light bulb regulations), and it doesn't matter how many people respond with other points of view to show that the
Mail's reporting has spun an issue in a misleading manner, you stick to what the
Mail says, never budging an inch, always seeing a world of pure black and white, where everyone is either good or evil.
So like Shahbanou, I'm having a hard time seeing the point of posting responses to your threads.