This may just be me.....being a grouch like I am.....but this all sounds pretty fishy. Even if this person is on the up+up......they are not going about this having done any research.
I wouldn't say fishy, because this kind of thing does happen occasionally. But it is a case of not doing their research.
Usually what happens when people find themselves in this sort of situation is:
- They came to the UK with just their passport, and were given a 6-month visitor visa stamp at the airport (which is the only way to be let into the country)
- They either were married already when they arrived and just thought they could move here without applying for any kind of visa first, or they thought they could apply for a visa after they arrived... or they decide to get married while they are here and again, either don't know they have to leave the country to get another visa to stay or they try to apply for that visa from inside the UK.
- So they either become an illegal overstayer by not leaving the UK within 6 months, or they try to apply for a spousal visa from inside the UK... which takes months to be processed because they applied when they didn't qualify for it and the application is treated as outside the rules.
- They end up having problems because UKVI correctly refuses their visa and tells them to leave and go back to their home country to apply.
- Instead of leaving like they are supposed to, they stay in the UK and try to appeal the decision... which isn't gonna be approved because they shouldn't have applied in the first place.
- They decide that UK immigration is treating them unfairly and that they are infringing on their human rights, even though the applicant was the one in the wrong in the first place
- They contact local MPs, they go to the newspapers, who run a sob story about how the government are unfairly tearing their family apart... and they get loads of comments from people who also do not know what the immigration rules are - which gives the general public yet another incorrect assumption about immigration.
- In the end they usually have to leave the UK, return to their home country and apply for a spousal visa... and if they had just done that in the first place, they wouldn't have had any of these immigration problems at all.
So, if Soryn had just left the UK back in June and applied for a spousal visa, none of this would be happening now. The problem is that they don't actually qualify to apply for a spousal visa, because they can't meet the financial requirement (unless perhaps his wife receives one of the benefits that means they are exempt from meeting the requirements).
What they have done instead is try to apply for the 10-year path, which is for people extending their current visa but who don't meet the financial requirements. However, the 10-year path can only be applied for from inside the UK, which they weren't legally allowed to do because they did not hold a visa that would allow them to extend their immigration status from inside the UK.
As the
10-year route immigration rules state (page 9):
The requirements to be met under the 10-year partner route are set out in paragraph R-LTRP.1.1.(a), (b) and (d) of Appendix FM. In order to qualify for a grant of leave under the 10-year partner route, an applicant must meet all of the requirements at every stage which are:
a) the applicant and their partner must be in the UK;
b) the applicant must have made a valid application for limited or indefinite leave to remain as a partner (subject to the exceptions set out in GEN.1.9. of Appendix FM and as outlined in Section 12.1 of this guidance); and
d) (i) the applicant must not fall for refusal under Section S-LTR; Suitability leave to remain; and
(ii) the applicant meets the relationship requirements of paragraphs E-LTRP.1.2-1.12 and the immigration status requirements in E-LTRP.2.1.(a) and (b); and
Appendix FM 1.0 Family Life (as a Partner or Parent) and Private Life: 10-Year Routes
November 2014
(iii) paragraph EX.1.(a) or (b) applies.
Where paragraph E-LTRP.2.1 of
Appendix FM states:
Immigration status requirements
E-LTRP.2.1. The applicant must not be in the UK-
(a) as a visitor; or
(b) with valid leave granted for a period of 6 months or less, unless that leave is as a fiancé(e) or proposed civil partner, or was granted pending the outcome of family court or divorce proceedings
Soryn seems to believe that this does not apply to him because he doesn't think he is a visitor in the UK... not sure exactly what he thinks he is then, because if you arrive in the UK with just your passport, you are admitted as a visitor, under visitor visa rules.
There is no other option - if he wasn't in the UK as a visitor, he wouldn't be here at all, because he wouldn't have been admitted into the UK in the first place.