@PahaKissa well for one thing, the loss of manufacturing jobs can't all be blamed on the EU as much as Margaret Thatcher. And saying EU would be like Congress is incorrect. Decisions about this country are made in Westminster, just as the in the US they are made by Congress. Also, the money we get back Westminster decides how to spend it. And yes, the EU passes some laws but i have yet to meet someone who can actually tell me what is so wrong with these laws. And actually, thank god for the EU because they wanted to enforce laws like maternity leave, 35 hour work week etc when the British government didn't. Now I bet people can't live without these rights.
All over the media, people are now realizing Westminster is to blame for these issues and the EU is the scapegoat. If it's so off base, why is every publication etc now saying these beliefs that the EU caused so much destruction in the UK are false? Why is no one except Donald Trump congratulating Britain for leaving? Why are there claims of leave voters being "idiots." If the EU was as bad and tyrannical as Leave voters believe why does virtually no one else agree? ****correction, no one else except extreme right-wing governments. I don't even think Putin has congratulated them.
A few things:
1. Workplace laws in the UK were either implemented prior to the EU such as racial discrimination or the UK has exceeded EU standards in every case.
2. We don't have a 35 hour week. There exists the working time directive, which limits work to 48 hours per week, but which over 90% of UK staff elect out of. So a pointless exercise.
3. There are hundreds of poor EU laws and regulations. Here is an example from my workplace.
I manage a quarry which produces material for concrete. As part of our process, we analyse the material to ensure that the subsequent concrete is of good quality and sound. In 2008, the EU issued regulations on this which are effectively law - I and the company can be fined or even lose our license for failing to follow them. However, the new rules, which superseded British Standards were written as a copy and paste from Spanish regs - which have never been followed since the 70's. The reason, the Spanish stopped following their own regulations is that if you make concrete to that specification, your concrete will disintegrate - not a good thing when most of our product is used in multi storey construction. So, at our expense, I have to follow the EU and record the results. But, then, in order to ensure the concrete doesn't collapse, we have to test it again to the old standards. So, all done twice. This is one example that the treasuries own reports show costs British business £10 billion per year.
As for the effect of the EU on British manufacturing, have a look at Ford Transit - closed down in the UK with funding from the EU to encourage it to move to mainland Europe. Or, Cadbury - same, Or, Gillette - same. I can reel off loads of cases of this. So, no, the EU might not have killed British manufacturing, but it is having a good try.
As for not agreeing the EU is a bad idea, have a look at the French public - 68% are anti EU. Or the Austrian, or thre Greek. Or the nation of Iceland.