Ah, okay - what happened then was that you didn't qualify for the FLR(M) visa under the self-employment category and instead of refusing your visa, you were placed on the 10-year route to ILR instead.
I've just had a read of the actual letter that was given to me when my visa was issued last Thursday. It seems I have only been allowed to get the visa and stay because I have a child. After is states I didn't do a "full" tax year as sole trader or limited, etc. it goes onto say...
"Consideration has been given under paragraphs R-LTRP.1.1 (a), (b), and (d) of Appendix FM which includes the exceptions paragraph EX.1 (a) and (b).
It is noted that you have a British Child (name) born on (date) with your partner (his name).
We are satisfied from the information you have provided in the form and the birth certificate that you meet the relevant eligibility and suitability requirements and you have a parental relationship with a child and it is not reasonable to expect that child to leave the United Kingdom.
Because of your particular circumstance you have been granted leave within the Immigration rules under D-LTRP.1.2 of Appendix FM"
I'm grateful and all but holy cow - basically I am now here on a pity visa...not one that shows I have actually earned it...just here because I have a kid? Wondering now if in the future they don't care about my earnings or just the fact I have a kid here? I now know why some people use the system, come here to have a kids just so they can stay.
It goes on to say I needs to be here 120 continuous in order to qualify for settlement.
Says...
"Providing you continue to meet the
relevant legislation at the time of application, you should apply for further leave prior to the expiry of your current leave via a charged application. Subject to getting that criteria you will be given a further period of leave of 30 months."
Definitely getting a solicitor to help me understand things ASAP. Truth is, my husband is self employed - sole trader for many years now - and has made the £18,600 but he doesn't use an accountant so we didn't use his income. I wonder if I could appeal it and use his earnings to make things happen quicker or if I am stuck with this decision. Going to speak to a solicitor tomorrow.