Not exactly a tax question but I know there are some smart people on here...
I'm asking for a friend....
She was born in 1959. She was married for 10+ years, never remarried, divorced, and he died after the divorce. I believe her full retirement age is 66 and 10 months, but if I have read this correctly the full age for survivor benefits is 66 and 6 months. She is 64 now. He was 11 years older than her, and waited until his full retirement age before taking his benefits.
Are we correct that she can start taking survivor benefits based on his work record now, although it will be reduced from his full amount because she is not yet full retirement age for survivor benefits? I saw a table which said that someone born in 1959, who took it at 62, would get the spouse's benefits but only get $803 per $1,000. Presumably, because she is 64 and not 62, this would be slightly higher.
Her plan is to do this, and defer taking her own benefits until she is 70. Does this make sense?
If she continues to work while taking survivor benefits is she penalised? I understand she will be taxed but will she incur any penalties?
Thanks in advance,
R