B,
I have to disagree with you on the UK taking drug abuse less seriously than the U.S. does. It seems that you need to loosen up on your definition of drug addicts and alcoholics. You may have never used either recreationally, but a lot of people have, with no dire consequences.
I have no credentials as a drug or alcohol counselor--I simply have 15 credits in psychology. However, my dad has a Ph.D. in psychology (i.e., he's a psychologist) and treated addicts for many, many years. Nothing, addiction-wise, is drastically different here from addiction in the States.
If you think drunks and addicts in the streets are exclusive to England, I can list Washington, D.C., areas where you can hang out with drunks, crack and heroin addicts, hookers who became hookers simply BECAUSE of their addictions, etc. Believe me, I've been asked for money more times than I could begin to put a number to--it got to the point where I'd say I'd be happy to buy him/her a meal, but not to just hand over money.
The NHS sucks overall--treating addicts is the least of its problems these days. I agree that U.S. medical care is a hundred times better than it is here, overall. However, I think it's silly to suggest that the U.S. handles drug or alcohol abuse any better than the UK does. Given that the gross majority of homicides in the States are drug or alcohol fueled, I'd go so far as to say the UK's probably doing considerably better than the U.S. is...
Your heart is absolutely in the right place, B. But you, of all people, should know that preaching is about the last thing anyone with a substance abuse problem is going to respond positively to. I'm sure you don't mean to, but you kind of come off as holier-than-thou. I think your best bet would be to try to be (or present yourself as) a little less judgmental, and considerably more understanding. I can't think of ANYONE who'd choose to be a drug addict or alcoholic. There's a pain behind substance abuse that goes way beyond a simple need for a buzz. Treating the sympton without getting to the cause will never work, and all the preaching in the world won't change that.
Lisa, no offense, but it's silly to suggest that changing the drinking age here will change teens' drinking habits. It didn't work in the States (the age changed from 18 to 21 when I was in college--it changed nothing with student drinking habits, although 75% of the campus suddenly couldn't legally drink). I'm 37 now, and still see the folly in thinking people under 21 won't find their way around age limits. There were many ways to get around it then, and I'm sure there are even more now.
I don't suggest the subject be taken lightly. However, I know for a fact that PSA's and scare tactics will have zero effect. I tried to talk several 14- to 15-year-olds out of dropping out of school and getting pregnant about a year ago. They were very working class, considered themselves very worldly, and actually started to listen to me simply because I had a different accent (I was walking down the street, smoked at the time, one asked me for a light, and that's how we got started talking). But for all I told them about how they should aim at getting as educated as possible, seeing a lot of the world, quitting smoking while it was still relatively easy, etc., and for all the enthusiastic (and sincere) agreement I got from them, I knew the effect of my words would last about 20 minutes (no, make that 1.5) once I walked away.
No one can change the world. If that were possible, no one would eat meat or wear leather, suede or furs, in my book. We all have our causes.
Suzanne