> suggest you use a dual US & UK qualified adviser so that you get a balanced view.
I would like a name if anyone knows. I guess I would prefer to pay someone and sort it all out altho I have gathered quite a bit of info from here.
As nun says, it is probably in my best interest to move all taxable money out of US. But I hate missing out on investment opportunities in the Mecca of capitalism, good old USA ! Also, all these rules are only for mutual funds / ETFs, not for shares. So I could buy shares directly in the US (if only I knew how to pick companies to invest in) and then I would pay only the UK rates for dividend and cap gains tax.
I guess Governments on both sides of the pond want to make life difficult for ordinary "passive" investors who are typically the middle class people many of whom dont have the time or ability to pick individual stocks and just stick to "lazy portfolios". The very fact that Government taxes stock-based-mutual-fund differently than direct stock purchases means that they have a different rule for the "Big Boys", "City boys" and others. Same old Governments with one rule for the rich, a pretense to "take care of the poor", and a totally screwy shafting rule for the middle class who are expected to bear the brunt of taxation.
Speaking of this mutual fund / ETF taxation business, let me try to understand the logic here : And I am not blaming just UK Govt here. I guess something similar is there in US not recognizing UK mutual funds. (unit trusts). What is the Government's stance here really other than the beureucratic motto of "We dont recognize each other" ? I understood part of it. Some funds roll up the dividend distribution so everything comes into capital gain. Fair point. The investor is trying to disguise "dividend income" into "capital gain" and pay a lesser rate of tax. Agreed, but why is this restricted just to "foreign mutual funds" ? Why not apply the same rules to domestic unit trusts as well ? As a UK resident, if I invest in Vanguard mutual funds in America, Vanguard is not the kind of company that hides dividend distributions. I am more than happy to pay 32% tax on the dividend distribution. But why ask me to pay a further 40% when I sell the fund ? I already paid the tax on dividend distribution !! And even if the stock-based-mutual-fund was indeed rolling up income and not distributing dividends, even then, at the time of sale I should be taxed 32% (and not 40%) because it is not like "bank interest". What does the word "income" mean in the context of stock mutual fund ? It MUST be dividend, isnt it ? So why tax me dividend income at 40% and not 32% ?
On an aside, there is another problem with moving my US money into UK and investing in UK equities : insurance limit. In US, SIPC insurance is upto $500K. In UK, it looks like only £48,000 of investors money is protected should the company that hold the investors security go bust.