What an odd sentence.
In the first instance, he did cause three deaths. It's awful and could have been avoided. But the sentence term-- it seems very excessive.
In the end, it was an accident and an unfortunate one, and yes he did cause DBDD. But when was the last time you heard of anyone going to jail for that amount of time for DBDD. Was Leeds CC trying to make some sort of point that foreigners shouldn't be driving?
All that said, the guy who caused the accident is an idiot for several reasons:
- Driving in a foreign country in the middle of the night in which you don't know the rules of the road for the country, the road signs, the markings, and you have only been in the country a few hours.
- He should have looked in any guide book. Chances are they would have listed the basic rules of the road for Britain and road markings for britain.
-If he was in any doubt, he should have just stayed on the left. When I started driving here I never went in the right lane. You are taught in America that the left lane is for passing and the right lane is for cruising. He should have had the sense to reverse those two, so essentially even if it was a dual carriagway, he was in the passing lane on a bend.