Really? Yeah, usually in biological science it's the research associate positions that require the PhD. Anything from research tech-research assistant is usually just a BSc or masters with some experience. The salary thing seems to not have much bearing on the title hierarchy as well because I've applied for research tech posts that start at £30, senior research tech posts that start at £25, and research assistant posts that start at £24!
Maybe I've misread a couple of 'associate' positions for 'assistant'
, although I'm pretty sure I saw at least one that said 'assistant' but required a PhD... I remember reading the advert, thinking that it would be ideal and then getting to the end of the job description and realising that I would need a PhD (I'm currently a PhD student, but I'm having second thoughts about continuing with the degree at the moment, so I've been doing some job listing searches)!
Yeah, the salaries can be strange - I remember my masters supervisor at Bristol last year talking about how the post-doc researchers were earning more than the lecturers! Apparently there was some loophole with the salary bands that allowed the post-docs to be eligible for the higher band because the lowest salary band didn't even require a PhD (weird)... so you had post-docs earning £30K and lecturers earning around £27K or so
.
Imperial probably just pips UCL in terms of academic reputation but if that's not important to you, pick whichever one you feel more comfortable with and is offering you the best deal.
Yeah I agree - I'd go with the department that is most suited to you personally. Last year, my department was located in one of the most well-known buildings at the university (
Cambridge-style), but my actual office was in the basement, and outside the window was a lovely view of the bike sheds and a 3-storey-high brick wall! So at the end of the day, it didn't really matter that the exterior of the building was gorgeous, because we never even saw it during the day!