Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: QROPS for US tax payers  (Read 5331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • *
  • Posts: 57

  • Investment manager for UK USA private clients
    • Private client asset management UK US
  • Liked: 4
  • Joined: Jul 2012
  • Location: London
Re: QROPS for US tax payers
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2015, 11:36:20 AM »
In quantifying the effect for "expense and poor investment choices" (quoting nun), we came to the view that all the QROPS we considered would perform at least 5% p.a. worse than that the client would expect to do with an untrammelled 100k of assets. Or, if you like most of the trend average return.
RNW
'Consistently beating the average global asset manager'


  • *
  • Posts: 2638

  • Liked: 107
  • Joined: Dec 2005
Re: QROPS for US tax payers
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2015, 01:00:09 PM »
In quantifying the effect for "expense and poor investment choices" (quoting nun), we came to the view that all the QROPS we considered would perform at least 5% p.a. worse than that the client would expect to do with an untrammelled 100k of assets. Or, if you like most of the trend average return.
To my uneducated mind performance will be a combination of investment return on the kinds of investments permitted within the wrapper; less fees charged and tax payable if the tax was capable of estimating.


  • *
  • Posts: 1912

  • Liked: 58
  • Joined: Apr 2008
Re: QROPS for US tax payers
« Reply #17 on: July 25, 2015, 06:15:26 PM »
My problem with the QROPS schemes I've looked at is the lack of transparency when it comes to fees. I would never invest without fully understanding the costs and investments offered. With the US/UK treaty in place and the recent UK pension liberalization QROPS for US tax payers don't seem very sensible to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Sponsored Links





 

coloured_drab