Background information
The key additional facts are firstly KentF is not a US citizen and secondly he took all his pension rights as a single lump sum.
Order of analysis
The logical order is to consider matters under the following three areas-
• Liability under US domestic rules.
• Liability under UK domestic rules.
• The position under the UK US double tax treaty.
US domestic rules
It is evident that the US has applied a 30% withholding tax on the payment. I do not know if this represents the final liability; others may be able to comment on this.
UK domestic rules
The full amount of the lump sum is not taxable in the UK. The technical position is complex because of various changes to the relevant provisions. There are various examples at EIM15326 which give a flavour of the application of the rules. KentF should consider taking professional advice, if the DTR relief rules do not provide relief from UK tax.
UK US double tax treaty
As KentF is not a US citizen, the “full” provisions of the treaty should be considered, and not the reduced provisions that apply to US citizens.
The relevant rules are set out in Article 17-
• Article 17(1)(a) gives a general rule that pension benefits should be taxed only in the state of residence of the payee, which would be the UK.
• Article 17(1)(b) gives a first modification to the above general rule. As relevant to KentF, this provides that any amount which would have been exempt from US tax in the hands of a US resident is to be tax exempt in the UK. I do not know if this has any relevance, as it would depend on an understanding of the US rules.
• Article 17(2) gives a second modification to the general rule. As relevant to KentF, it says that a lump sum payment is taxable only in the US and not in the UK. The treaty does not give any definition of a lump sum payment but this would appear to cover the entire commutation of pension rights.
In summary, Article 17(2) would appear to provide that the UK has no taxing rights.
Overall
Overall, the double tax treaty and UK domestic rules should provide that the lump sum is either largely or entirely exempt from UK tax.
Perhaps in due course KentF would share the outcome of matters.