Nefandous
Thank you for taking the time to reply. I had no wish to cause offence.
No? Then why the choice of wording in your response if not argumentative? Or was it merely duplicitous or provocative?
Your initial response was to counter mine.
That's inaccuarate I'm sure you'll agree, reading back what I asked was
not too sure in what context you're saying these things. Could you clarify to what you're refering to for us please?
which was a request for information to your post.
It was to the effect that I was wrong. I respect that opinion, but I don't share it. I made a post to support my opinion. I’m sorry you didn’t like it – you made that abundantly clear. Yet you go on to say you won’t badger people for making a simple mistake…..
It was to the effect of understanding your point of view, which you have yet to tell us except that you like to have an argument about very little. I wanted a discussion. I'm sure if you go back and read all that's written, and possibly have a look at some old postings from various members that all people's points of view that this forum is free and fair to all that have come onto it. However, if someone comes into the forum without introduction, without any feined respected for any of it's members generally the person is treated with the same distain in return. "Treat those as you wish to be treated." on this board if not on all boards.
Moreover there is an etiquette that should be followed if you want anything you say to be taken with any kind of respect that most visiters to this forum have complied with. Hopefully you will give us the honour of an introduction and perhaps you will also help us to understand your gripes and/or hang-ups about certain "issues". And perhaps you may think about whether you're the first to bring such issues up.
As for changing the title of the Most Famous English…to British. Your text was clearly referring to English (I think you mentioned quintessentially English). What misunderstanding could there possibly be that you were seeking to address ?
lol
Well the fact that other people who posted after me made this particular heading irrelevant. I did indeed mention quintessentially English, and being observant I know that you noticed that i only mentioned English people. However, this was followed with peoples posts who were most definitely not in the least English, therefore making the original title irrelevant.
If you don't understand my motivation then we can take this over into pettifog, where perhaps I should have put it as soon as I saw your question arise.
I see nothing unfair about a question relating just to famous English people but if your post was intended to encompass all British people as you now say and you entitled it ….famous English” then one could be excused for thinking that you used “English” to mean British………..which was precisely the point I initially made.
There's quite a large hole in your logic here. That is that you're thinking that the whole thread sprang from nowhere and was all on the one subject. This is one of the reasons I suggested that you read from the forum in more depth. Then you would see that no matter the subject, they can get diverted onto other topics. Yes, even from English celebrities to British celebrities and just at anyone's whim. As these two subjects are so close I found no need to change them into two catagories. To me, I'm not so pedantic that I wish to submit every little line to an enquiry.
Your initial point was *are "we" on the forum using English to mean British and visa versa* or the equivalent. No, is the reply, not unless the individual wants to

...so you'll have to ask each of us individually to find out exactly who wants to use each as a synonym for the other.
- And by the way, I did want to make this a friendly and amicable discussion, but due to your choice of words in your reply. I decided that maybe a hint of sarcasm was required, as it seemed to me, and still seems to me that you're just continually *discussing* for arguements sake.