Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: re-marketing classics  (Read 2387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

re-marketing classics
« on: August 27, 2006, 09:32:10 AM »
I just bought my girls Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights which have new covers that resemble other books that they have read.  I thought it was interesting since I have suggested they read them for years, but it wasn't until the publisher put them in shiny pink covers that they showed any interest.  We even went to the Classics section and looked at the other editions and they said they'd never read those.  Isn't is strange what difference a cover can make. 
They also come with a forward by a modern author about why you should read it, and have facts that will impress your teacher at the end. 
I thought is was a pretty good idea.  What does everyone else think?


[attachment deleted by admin]


  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2691

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jun 2004
  • Location: Atmospheric
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2006, 01:15:10 PM »

Sure, why not? If it gets another generation interested in classics then I'm all for it.
I know I'm late - where's the booze?


  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 18728

  • Liked: 2
  • Joined: Sep 2003
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2006, 01:36:37 PM »
I agree but I'm curious to find out if your girls actually enjoy the books.  Inever made it all the way through either of those and I don't think the cover would have made any difference.


Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2006, 03:48:33 PM »
Sure, why not? If it gets another generation interested in classics then I'm all for it.

What she said. :)

Although I have to admit that I hated Wuthering Heights.  I wanted to throw mopey, annoying Catherine into the nearest pond.


  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 5656

  • Witchiepoo
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: May 2003
  • Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2006, 04:00:15 PM »
Love, love, love Pride and Prejudice.  And ditto annoying Catherine in the nearest pond.  I can never understand why people think Catherine and Heathcliff is such a wonderful love story.  Pah!  Bunch of nutcases, if you ask me.

I've been reading a lot of classics lately on my PDA.  Been downloading them for free via manybooks.net or Project Gutenberg.  There was even one where set in the 1920's with a North American professor's impressions after visiting England.  Seems quite a piss-take and rather amusing in its own way.

Currently reading Vanity Fair.
Insert wonderfully creative signature here …


  • *
  • Posts: 195

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Aug 2006
  • Location: Dallas to Manchester to Austin TX to Tulsa OK to Manchester UK
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2006, 03:28:44 PM »
I loved Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre. I didn't like Jane Austen and all the relationships and class satire though. I like the story of Pride and Prejudice, but I just don't like the writing style of Jane Austen. Wish I could find something to compete with the Brontes though.


  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 6435

  • Unavailable for Comment.
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Aug 2002
  • Location: Leeds
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2006, 07:46:53 PM »
I've always loved Jane Austen. She did speak a lot about class but that's because it was always so important during her time.

She created such strong women characters. Something you didn't see all that often from books of that time.

I loved Jane Eyre but I simply hate Wuthering Heights. I've tried so hard to like the story and the characters but I simply hate them.

Mindy, what do your girls think of the books? I think it's great that they're remarketing the books. Get 'em reading!
There are two things in life for which we are never truly prepared:  twins.


  • *
  • Posts: 195

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Aug 2006
  • Location: Dallas to Manchester to Austin TX to Tulsa OK to Manchester UK
Re: re-marketing classics
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2006, 08:00:22 PM »
Well, I didn't particularly like Catherine or Heathcliff but was drawn into the story by the dark, brooding, mysterious atmosphere of the writing. I just had to keep reading despite by ambivalence to the characters.

As for Jane Eyre, she was one heck of a complex character, and the reader is allowed to know her so intimately. There was so much Biblical symbolism in Jane Eyre that is lost on someone without the background knowledge, but very thought provoking to someone who picks up on it. Such as the fact that Mr. Rochester tries to convince Jane to be his mistress. She takes the high road. In a cruel twist of fate, he loses his eyesight and his right hand (in "fulfillment" of Mat 5:29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast [it] from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not [that] thy whole body should be cast into hell.) In the end he is restored and forgiven, as is the "Christian" idea.

So, while Jane Eyre was super moral, and centered around religiousness, Wuthering Heights was basically an amoral and godless universe. I find it very interesting to see how the daughters of a super legalistic preacher in the Victorian Era express such tumultuous themes in different ways... like they had so much passion and vitality but were repressed by their culture. I didn't get quite the same connection with Austen. I could relate because growing up I had the same types of emotions, and my parents might as well have lived in the Victorian age.


Sponsored Links





 

coloured_drab