Susie, they need to be spanked because they are out of line. Bang out of line.
For those who recently joined the immigration scene, it seems terribly counterintuitive that I'm comming down on a consulate/BHC that's only trying to help. But in reality, they are not supposed to be doing that and it was the ADVOCACY side who fought to make it that way.
Practitioners who can look back to the old days when ECO's were engaging the public on the telephone, or putting up their own local websites, or going to local events without supervision created total *CHAOS* when it was vectored on the net. It was devastating and actually brought tragedy to people's lives when they acted on something that was vectored erroneously from an 'official' source.
So ECO's have already been ring-fenced from the outside world, and all those TOTALLY ROGUE websites run by individual consulates have to be removed by the end of this year. And email from a consulate needs to be drawn from formulae which has been composed by professional writers and approved by the English usage team.
Seem bureaucratic? Yes. But otherwise there's disaster.
To the case at hand, an advisory on the UKBA site within HOURS of when it first happened along with a general press release, along with a followup to the practitioners, along with scripts sent to Worldbridge, etc etc.