Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: UK: Govt. says mothers may not look after each other's children  (Read 6925 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • *
  • Posts: 3427

  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2008
  • Location: Barnsley, UK
Re: UK: Govt. says mothers may not look after each other's children
« Reply #45 on: October 13, 2009, 03:03:28 PM »
Well, it seems the government don't say that at all!  ::)
"We don't want our chocolate to get cheesy!"


  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 18728

  • Liked: 2
  • Joined: Sep 2003


  • *
  • Banned
  • Posts: 6640

  • Big black panther stalking through the jungle!
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Feb 2005
  • Location: Norfolk, England
Re: UK: Govt. says mothers may not look after each other's children
« Reply #47 on: October 18, 2009, 11:41:01 AM »
At least this has been cleared up, although if the Guardian's wording accurately reflects what actually happened, it's still rather worrying the way it comes across as the minister having to get some sort of agreement with Ofsted, and saying that parents will "no longer" have to undergo the formal childcare courses etc. when he's also clearly stating that the regulations never said that they had to in the first place.

But we're seeing this sort of thing more and more, where even when the legal people in the government make it perfectly clear what the law allows or does not allow, officials in some other department decide that "That's not our interpretation of the law," and continue to try to apply their own rules.   Two examples which come to mind immediately:

1.  Police forces continuing to seize vehicles at the roadside just because it doesn't appear on the Motor Insurance Database and the driver cannot produce proof of insurance on the spot, even though they've been told that this is illegal and to stop.

2.  Local authorities trying to enforce extra fees and requirements over Building Regulations, even though the central government office in charge of enforcing the rules has told them in no uncertain terms that they aren't allowed to do so.

From
Bar
To car
To
Gates ajar
Burma Shave

1941
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dreaming of one who truly is La plus belle pour aller danser.


  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 18728

  • Liked: 2
  • Joined: Sep 2003
Re: UK: Govt. says mothers may not look after each other's children
« Reply #48 on: October 18, 2009, 11:57:33 AM »
You might want to start a new topic to talk about that - I think the conspiracy theory over the Ofsted thing just bit the dust.  ;)


  • *
  • Posts: 2954

  • It's 4:20 somewhere!
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Mar 2006
  • Location: Earth
Re: UK: Govt. says mothers may not look after each other's children
« Reply #49 on: October 18, 2009, 12:25:08 PM »
off topic but as this thread is finished I'll make a last post.


1.  Police forces continuing to seize vehicles at the roadside just because it doesn't appear on the Motor Insurance Database and the driver cannot produce proof of insurance on the spot, even though they've been told that this is illegal and to stop.

I still think this one where they destroy the car is so wrong! If one didn't pay property tax, would they seize the house and then crush it? Hell no. So why do that to cars?

A bit ungreen also, if that is a relatively new car. Shouldn't they sell it and take the fine from the proceeds?

 [smiley=bomb.gif]
Still tired of coteries and bans. But hanging about anyway.


Sponsored Links