Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!  (Read 4300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • *
  • Posts: 2954

  • It's 4:20 somewhere!
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Mar 2006
  • Location: Earth
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #30 on: October 14, 2009, 07:40:32 PM »
Many states provide it even if the parents earn quite a bit of money.  Even when parents can afford it, if your kid gets really sick, the state has good coverage.  At least in PA.
Just as an aside, healthcare for children does vary from state to state. Where I live in Maryland, they have a pretty good state system to make sure kids don't go uninsured if the parents can't afford it.

How cool! That is a start. Thanks for letting us know as I didn't know there were any states that did that. Are these recent changes?

Still tired of coteries and bans. But hanging about anyway.


  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 13328

  • Officially a Brit.
  • Liked: 2
  • Joined: Mar 2004
  • Location: Maryland
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #31 on: October 14, 2009, 09:29:45 PM »
I don't know how recent they are. I think you may find the states offer it based on party lines, too. Maryland is, for the most part, a traditionally democratic state so I'd suspect they've had something in place for a while now. PA is a bit funny and can go either way. I'm glad to hear they do this. Virginia, however, does not offer comprehensive health care for children, as far as I know.

I was really impressed with the Maryland cover. It was just as good as the cover we eventually got from my husband's job through the Federal government.
When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life. ~ John Lennon


Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #32 on: October 15, 2009, 09:33:16 PM »
I don't know how recent they are. I think you may find the states offer it based on party lines, too. Maryland is, for the most part, a traditionally democratic state so I'd suspect they've had something in place for a while now. PA is a bit funny and can go either way. I'm glad to hear they do this. Virginia, however, does not offer comprehensive health care for children, as far as I know.

I was really impressed with the Maryland cover. It was just as good as the cover we eventually got from my husband's job through the Federal government.

Texas has really good coverage for children too and has for years. Both of my sons were on it at one time when we didn't have medical insurance. The cost was $7 per month but at that time we didn't even have to pay that for them to be covered. Prescriptions were $7 and under too. And the kids had a regular primary care physician and didn't have to go to clinics to be seen. We were very happy with it.


  • *
  • Posts: 1150

  • Liked: 19
  • Joined: Jun 2009
  • Location: Inverness, Scotland
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2009, 10:46:43 PM »
Wisconsin has had what they call BadgerCare for at least a decade.  It covers uninsured kids, pregnant women, and families with children.  It was a literal lifesaver when my then 19 year-old sister (who had undiagnosed lupus) developed a number of complications with her pregnancy.  As a result, my nephew was delivered 3 months early, at 1 lb, 13 oz.  He spent the next 2 months in hospital, and spent the majority of the first year of his life needing a heart monitor, etc.  Because of Badger Care, he was covered 100%, and got excellent care at the state's best children's hospital.

If my sister had been married, and the pregnancy and birth had been covered under my brother-in-law's employer-provided coverage, my nephew would have 'maxed-out' his lifetime coverage limit before he ever left the hospital.

Recently, they started offering Badger Care to uninsured adults (without kids) as well.  Even with some tough restrictions (not available unless you've been without *access* to an employer health plan for at least a year), they've had so many enrollments that they've had to suspend new enrollment.  They've started a waiting list for coverage, and there's no real estimate as to when those on the list will actually get covered.


  • *
  • Posts: 3427

  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2008
  • Location: Barnsley, UK
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2009, 11:57:29 AM »
So wrong isn't it. Certainly with respect to children. And yet none of my stateside family would ever entertain the idea of even discussing socialised healthcare. Yet they all think it's cool and how lucky I am when I tell them about any visit to the doctors or hospital etc.  ''Wow. You were in the hospital for 4 days and didn't pay nothing? Wow you are so lucky, we got to do... blah blah blah...and we gotta pay...blah, blah, blah...moan, moan, moan''  Yea I'm the black sheep of the family or is that red sheep in this case?
 

Yep, when DW phones her folks and mentions about the healthcare she received and that it's nothing like what is being portrayed on Fox she just gets platitudes like "Well, I'm pleased it's working out for you" or "That's good that you were ok" as though she's an exception to the stories they are hearing, not that she is the norm.
"We don't want our chocolate to get cheesy!"


  • *
  • Posts: 3821

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jan 2007
  • Location: London
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2009, 12:04:31 PM »
Wisconsin has had what they call BadgerCare for at least a decade.  It covers uninsured kids, pregnant women, and families with children.  It was a literal lifesaver when my then 19 year-old sister (who had undiagnosed lupus) developed a number of complications with her pregnancy.  As a result, my nephew was delivered 3 months early, at 1 lb, 13 oz.  He spent the next 2 months in hospital, and spent the majority of the first year of his life needing a heart monitor, etc.  Because of Badger Care, he was covered 100%, and got excellent care at the state's best children's hospital.

If my sister had been married, and the pregnancy and birth had been covered under my brother-in-law's employer-provided coverage, my nephew would have 'maxed-out' his lifetime coverage limit before he ever left the hospital.

Recently, they started offering Badger Care to uninsured adults (without kids) as well.  Even with some tough restrictions (not available unless you've been without *access* to an employer health plan for at least a year), they've had so many enrollments that they've had to suspend new enrollment.  They've started a waiting list for coverage, and there's no real estimate as to when those on the list will actually get covered.


Well, as your post demonstrates, Americans clearly want government out of their healthcare.

And if you threw a party
Invited everyone you knew
You would see the biggest gift would be from me
And the card attached would say
"Thank you for being a friend!"


  • *
  • Posts: 6537

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jul 2006
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2009, 12:16:14 PM »
Pa offers great care to low paid uninsured adults as well.  GREAT coverage.  But it had about a year waiting list when I signed up.

You could pay 200 a month though to get on it while waiting, which I could have done, except I was in grad school and only working like 15 hours a week so I made about 200 a month.  Oh well.


  • *
  • Posts: 2954

  • It's 4:20 somewhere!
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Mar 2006
  • Location: Earth
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2009, 01:38:31 PM »
Yep, when DW phones her folks and mentions about the healthcare she received and that it's nothing like what is being portrayed on Fox she just gets platitudes like "Well, I'm pleased it's working out for you" or "That's good that you were ok" as though she's an exception to the stories they are hearing, not that she is the norm.

Don't really know Fox other than what I hear about but are you saying they spew out BS about our NHS?

Your DW's mother and mine aren't the same and one are they? Certainly sounds it. Reading those statements, I can actually hear my mother's voice. LOL

Still tired of coteries and bans. But hanging about anyway.


  • *
  • Posts: 3427

  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2008
  • Location: Barnsley, UK
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2009, 04:02:48 PM »
Don't really know Fox other than what I hear about but are you saying they spew out BS about our NHS?

Your DW's mother and mine aren't the same and one are they? Certainly sounds it. Reading those statements, I can actually hear my mother's voice. LOL



Basically yes.

Actually it's DW's father and sister, but maybe they are related!
"We don't want our chocolate to get cheesy!"


  • *
  • Posts: 150

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jun 2009
  • Location: Southern Cal to Essex in Jan. 2010!
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2009, 05:31:29 PM »
He is obese according to the article, not according to me.  And to quote myself...I said:

If you read the other things I wrote, you would see that my emphasis was on the double-standard of overweight vs underweight children...how the doctors, parents, etc. think it's fine for a child to be overweight but if I child is in the bottom percentiles, they freak out.  I find this interesting because according to all the specialist I've seen being overweight is more dangerous than being underweight. 

But I don't believe that this statement is accurate. I have friends with very large babies and their doctors have been concerned about their weight and have directed them in controlling their weight gain.  These have been formula fed babies so more efforts could be made (i.e., watering down formula). 

My son was 7 lbs 15 oz when he was born. He was in the 90th percentile for height and weight until he was 1.  Every well baby exam I asked my doctor if he was getting too fat and she told me "no" and that he was following the curve, meaning his height and weight growth were similar.  He's now 2 and in the 80th percentile for height and weight.  This happens to run in my family.  Babies get big very fast and then even out when they are toddlers.  They won't be obese adults if the parents teach good habits early.


  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2503

  • Liked: 6
  • Joined: Jul 2006
  • Location: Northern Ireland
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2009, 04:00:45 PM »
And now a 2 year old girl denied coverage for being too small.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33411196/ns/today-today_health/
The Guide For Working Families review http://londonelegance.com/transpondia/twfg/


  • Jewlz
  • is in the house because....
  • *
  • Posts: 8647

  • International Woman of Mystery
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jun 2008
  • Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Re: US: Four-Month-Old Baby Turned Down for Health Insurance. He's Too 'Fat'!
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2009, 04:28:04 PM »
Yep, when DW phones her folks and mentions about the healthcare she received and that it's nothing like what is being portrayed on Fox she just gets platitudes like "Well, I'm pleased it's working out for you" or "That's good that you were ok" as though she's an exception to the stories they are hearing, not that she is the norm.


People do this to me, too! They say, oh well, it's good you are young and healthy. Like they just let old people die here or something.  ::)


Sponsored Links