Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount  (Read 1321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • *
  • Posts: 4

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Sep 2010
Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount
« on: April 09, 2011, 05:22:06 PM »
I shipped my items from the UK to the USA.  The moving charged me for shipping 380 CU FT.

Because the contained was inspected at US customs I had to pay for my part of the container.  I was charged for 250 CU FT.

So I see a difference of 130 CU FT between the movers and the customs measurements.

Have the shipping company just ripped me off ?  Or is there some other things I need to consider ?

Thanks


  • *
  • Posts: 1334

  • Liked: 2
  • Joined: Dec 2004
  • Location: Texas
Re: Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2011, 06:40:03 PM »
Was the weight possibly a factor? 


  • *
  • Posts: 712

  • UF College of Vet Med Class of 2010!!
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Oct 2007
  • Location: Durham, Co. Durham!
Re: Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2011, 08:24:19 PM »
Was there any irregularity in the size of the shipment? I know when my stuff was "calculated" for cubic feet they took the longest measurement by the longest measurement - even if it didn't actually take up the *whole* volume.
"Treat for the treatable" - Uncle Mikey's Maxim # 1


  • *
  • Posts: 4

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Sep 2010
Re: Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2011, 06:20:49 AM »
Was the weight possibly a factor? 

No I do not believe that they used the weight.  At least it was not in the paper work.


  • *
  • Posts: 4

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Sep 2010
Re: Shipping charge for CU FT more than the real amount
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2011, 06:23:05 AM »
Was there any irregularity in the size of the shipment? I know when my stuff was "calculated" for cubic feet they took the longest measurement by the longest measurement - even if it didn't actually take up the *whole* volume.

Interesting, but the furniture was oblong and one round small piece.  Thanks for the input.


Sponsored Links