Hello
Guest

Sponsored Links


Topic: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME  (Read 5939 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • *
  • Banned
  • Posts: 28

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jul 2011
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #30 on: July 15, 2011, 04:01:25 PM »
Good question--I don't know. I never thought about it until it became an issue that I might need someone else to "courier my cat!"


Agghh my brain hurts!


  • *
  • Posts: 3344

  • British by descent
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2009
  • Location: London
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #31 on: July 15, 2011, 04:05:28 PM »
The requirements - as listed on the website are that your pet travel on an approved route. No mention is made of you accompanying your pet, except in the leaflet/PDF about the changes being put in place in 2012 (however, the website lists those steps as well, and makes no mention of it, which makes me think it's a typo).
Moved to London February 5, 2010


  • *
  • Banned
  • Posts: 28

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jul 2011
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2011, 04:11:49 PM »
That makes sense--thanks for putting me at ease.

This would be so much easier if the QM2 didn't completely bollox up their scheme for transporting cats last year. Original plan was to move all my worldly posessions (which ain't that much) and my cat on the boat...

but now they've upped the price for a cat to $1,000 and no availability until November 2012.


  • *
  • Posts: 3344

  • British by descent
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2009
  • Location: London
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #33 on: July 15, 2011, 04:29:29 PM »
I've posted a new thread detailing the PETS Process as it will be in 2012.

I also called DEFRA (just 'cause I'm bored and it's Friday :P). Per their advice:
- You do not have to accompany your pet, nor will you have to in 2012
- If your pet does end up in quarantine, it would just be for the 21 days maximum
Moved to London February 5, 2010


  • *
  • Banned
  • Posts: 28

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Jul 2011
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #34 on: July 15, 2011, 04:36:25 PM »
Two words:

YOU

ROCK!


Thanks!

(OK 3 words)


  • *
  • Posts: 92

  • I am my own worst enemy
    • Jillian and Angela's UK Excellent Adventure
  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Nov 2010
  • Location: Flower Mound, TX
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #35 on: July 15, 2011, 05:00:08 PM »
Thanks, equestrianerd.  I was about to have an unexpected freak out moment.
Tier 4 Visa application overnighted to New York: 25 August 2011


  • *
  • Posts: 33

  • Liked: 1
  • Joined: Jul 2011
  • Location: North Bergham
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #36 on: July 22, 2011, 02:32:37 PM »
Me too...I just found this site hoping my questions would be answered with this PETS thing because I just can't make sense out any government websites, no matter what the country!!


  • *
  • Posts: 148

  • Liked: 0
  • Joined: Aug 2010
  • Location: Georgia
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #37 on: July 22, 2011, 03:13:32 PM »
Just to add that I am in the middle of the process and won't be moving until next year but the state USDA vet (Georgia) for me won't even think about the new process until it becomes official.  So if you are planning to move right after Jan 1 - you might not be able to get them to sign off on the forms with the new standards until a bit after that. 


  • *
  • Posts: 2868

  • Liked: 1
  • Joined: May 2007
  • Location: Surrey
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #38 on: July 22, 2011, 03:21:59 PM »
Would it be correct to assume then that for animals already here (and up to date on rabies vax), that they could go to another EU country and re-enter the UK without having to bother with tick/tapeworm before re-entry?


  • *
  • Posts: 3344

  • British by descent
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2009
  • Location: London
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #39 on: July 22, 2011, 03:27:59 PM »
Would it be correct to assume then that for animals already here (and up to date on rabies vax), that they could go to another EU country and re-enter the UK without having to bother with tick/tapeworm before re-entry?

DEFRA's site says:

Quote
Under the new rules there is no requirement for pets to be treated for ticks before their arrival in the UK.

The UK is currently in discussion with the European Commission about continued controls on tapeworm for dogs entering the UK.

Qualitative risk assessments have been carried out on the risk of incursion of the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis and various tick borne diseases.

So it looks like you'd still need to do tapeworm for dogs (doesn't say anything about cats ???) until the rules get changed with the European Commission, but post-Jan 1 you wouldn't need to do the tick treatment.
Moved to London February 5, 2010


  • *
  • Posts: 1260

  • Liked: 63
  • Joined: Jun 2011
  • Location: Congleton, Cheshire
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #40 on: July 22, 2011, 10:00:14 PM »
Be aware....DEFRA may not require that you accompany your pet, but the airline might, and during the summer months, even the origination airport may be restricted. I ended up driving my husband and a cat from Richmond VA to Atlanta in June to fly on Delta....because we had to 'originate' in a gateway city, and hubby and cat had to be on the same flight.

Further - certain UK airports do NOT accept unaccompanied animals. That isn't DEFRA...it's the airport. So double and triple check before you plan to go.
Married December 1992 (my 'old flame' whom I first met in the mid-70s)
1st move to UK - 1993 (Letter of Consent granted at British Embassy in Washington DC)
ILR - 1994 (1 year later - no fee way back then!)
Back to US in 2000
Returned to UK July 2011 (Spousal Visa/KOL endorsement)
ILR - September 2011
Application for naturalization submitted July 2014
Approval received 15-10-14; ceremony scheduled for 10 November!
Passport arrived 25 November 2014. Finally done!


  • *
  • Posts: 33

  • Liked: 1
  • Joined: Jul 2011
  • Location: North Bergham
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #41 on: July 26, 2011, 01:56:29 PM »
Be aware....DEFRA may not require that you accompany your pet, but the airline might, and during the summer months, even the origination airport may be restricted. I ended up driving my husband and a cat from Richmond VA to Atlanta in June to fly on Delta....because we had to 'originate' in a gateway city, and hubby and cat had to be on the same flight.

Further - certain UK airports do NOT accept unaccompanied animals. That isn't DEFRA...it's the airport. So double and triple check before you plan to go.

Thank you for that additional info vadio--certainly important. Thank god they changed the law to 21 days and I can worry about this next year...just too much to do right now.

I'm hoping I would be able to get my father to accompany my cat on a flight when he comes to visit. My only other option would be to fly back myself then get and Icelandair one-way ticket back (it's approved route from JFK-LHR) and escort the cat...

I really don't understand this "approved route" nonsense. Why in the world does DEFRA/UK care how you get to the airport? This whole specific airline but only from this city-to this city seem ridiculous.

Can anybody explain the logic behind it? Thanks.


  • *
  • Posts: 3344

  • British by descent
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2009
  • Location: London
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #42 on: July 26, 2011, 02:21:42 PM »
I really don't understand this "approved route" nonsense. Why in the world does DEFRA/UK care how you get to the airport? This whole specific airline but only from this city-to this city seem ridiculous.

Can anybody explain the logic behind it? Thanks.

My guess is that it's thanks to airlines lobbying for it. Some airlines allow pets as excess baggage (which is significantly cheaper than cargo), but because of the approved routes, you have to pay more to do cargo. The pets are in the same area of the plane whether they fly as excess baggage or cargo, so the difference is just $$$$.

You can get around it (Icelandair is approved and only charges excess baggage fees; some people have flown in to France and traveled via a non-air route into the UK; QM2; etc), but it's a lot of hassle.
Moved to London February 5, 2010


  • *
  • Posts: 33

  • Liked: 1
  • Joined: Jul 2011
  • Location: North Bergham
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #43 on: July 26, 2011, 02:47:40 PM »
You can get around it (Icelandair is approved and only charges excess baggage fees; some people have flown in to France and traveled via a non-air route into the UK; QM2; etc), but it's a lot of hassle.

Well my mom's boyfriend lives in France and she goes there regularly, so it's not a problem at all for her to take my cat to France, then from there (can you chunnel a cat? I wonder--I'm going to look that up) take him to the U.K.

My original plan was QM2, and I'm still taking the QM2 (for luggage/shipping reasons, no limit on what you can take as long as it fits in your room), but now they charge $1,000 per cat and the first available kennel space is November, 2012.

Hence I will have to have the cat flown on a separate trip no matter what.


  • *
  • Posts: 3344

  • British by descent
  • Liked: 3
  • Joined: Jan 2009
  • Location: London
Re: CHANGES TO PETS SCHEME
« Reply #44 on: July 26, 2011, 04:23:53 PM »
Well my mom's boyfriend lives in France and she goes there regularly, so it's not a problem at all for her to take my cat to France, then from there (can you chunnel a cat? I wonder--I'm going to look that up) take him to the U.K.

You can use the Eurotunnel, or there are a handful of ferry companies/routes that you can use (though I think I remember hearing that that's not the best plan as your cat would have to stay in your car, which ends up on a separate level of the ferry from you, which would probably suck for the cat).
Moved to London February 5, 2010


Sponsored Links