Hi,
If anyone could help it would be much appreciated!
My wife is an American citizen who moved to the UK on May 29, 2012. We were married on September 21st, 2012 and then had a Leave to Remain visa granted on February 19 2013. After the time it took to process that visa, we decided to take the fast track for the ILR and booked our appointment for today. This was based on the advice given in the literature that came with the original visa that said, "... you must have completed a period of two years in the United Kingdom as the spouse." Bearing in mind the chronology of the events above, my wife would appear to qualify.
Nevertheless, our application has been rejected out of hand on the grounds that the two year period only began on the date her current visa was issued. The legal justification for this is apparently contained within the following paragraphs:
"The requirements for indefinite leave to remain for the spouse or civil partner of a
person present and settled in the United Kingdom are that:
(i) (a) the applicant was admitted to the United Kingdom for a period not exceeding 27
months or given an extension of stay for a period of 2 years in accordance with
paragraphs 281 to 286 of these Rules and has completed a period of 2 years as the
spouse or civil partner of a person present and settled in the United Kingdom."
Please could someone explain whether they were right to reject her application, given that my wife does appear to meet the requirements outlined above. This appointment cost us £1500, and the only thing we managed to secure was the kindly assurance that we'll have the opportunity to pay that amount all over again in February. Right now, it feels as though we have been robbed!
Many thanks in advance for the advice.
Best regards,
Michael