That second option sounds pretty good. Maybe then you could even get one of those personal mobile towers so that you'll have a good signal as well.
I don't mind the lack of mobile signal, except that we were aware superfast missed our house here, so we took contracts with EE before we moved because they claimed to offer 4G service at our address (we foolishly did not verify this for ourselves, because we bought our house after one walk through while living 150 miles away), and EE were the only ones suggesting they could supply our address. We got plans with high data allowances, because we were going to tether to our computers, and that would be our internet and phone, all in one. It's almost funny to think about how naive that plan was.
What I don't understand is, we're not the only house here... I don't understand why we seem to have been overlooked by the first pass of the superfast rollout. There's a whole village here that don't get superfast. But when They started making noise about further improving the speeds in the cities, while some of us are still clamoring for
anything, it is a bit frustrating. I think, like the postal service, internet access should have a universal service obligation, no matter the cost of implementation. It shouldn't have a profit motive. It should be a basic societal right, with equal access for everybody.
</soapbox>