And on a side note, earlier someone was talking about a change like this not having any support or something along those lines. There was an election in 2016 and overwhelmingly the American people nominated the candidate who spoke out about the need for radical change to the broken immigration system. President Trump made it VERY clear what he wanted to do with extreme vetting, and social media history is just a part of it. Simple as.
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
A little late, but I've been busy with the laundry. About that "overwhelming" bit. A close race, but he lost the popular vote by a measurable margin.
Presidential ticket Votes % of total
Trump / Pence Republican 62,984,828
46.09%Clinton / Kaine Democratic 65,853,514
48.18%Johnson / Weld Libertarian 4,489,235 3.27%
Stein / Baraka Green 1,457,226 1.06%
McMullin / Finn Independent 732,273 0.53%
Castle / Bradley Constitution 203,091 0.15%
Trump is a puppet. (And seeming to be a not terribly bright one.) I'm still curious as to precisely who is pulling the strings, really. Pence scares the willies out of me, so it could be him. Or... eh, I'll never know. And I'm probably much happier not knowing. The history books will sort it out in 50 years. If they're not censored. It all depends on who 'wins', then, doesn't it. Only a fool would think that "the American People" are in charge in the USA. Or that their "social media" isn't already on a hard drive somewhere, being mined as we read.
Ah, spin cycle is over. Can go back to doing something productive, like hanging up my socks. Have a nice night, all.
[Edit: "Fool" in the metaphorical sense. Not trying to insult anyone here specifically!]