But officially there is mo such thing as "marriage visa" other than "visitor for marriage", and it really really drives me mad that the same user here keeps posting teh same false information in response to multiple posts about what things are called "officially". have you considered reading Appendix FM ONCE mate, if you are going to give people legal advice which you are clearly not qualified to do?
I do not give false information and I have read Appendix FM multiple times since it was published in 2012.
While the UKVI website mentions applying as a fiance, when it actually comes to the visa being applied for and issued, there is no option to select a fiance visa as the visa type... because it is not officially called that. The visa type you have to select in order to apply for a fiance visa is MARRIAGE. Several people have accidentally ended up applying for the wrong type of visa because they thought that a MARRIAGE visa was a spousal visa, when it isn't. It is a fiance visa. Which is why we are careful to clarify that a marriage visa is for fiances and a Wife/Husband visa is for spouses.
When a fiance visa is issued, the visa type printed on it is:
Marriage/CPAnd when a Marriage Visitor Visa is issued, the visa type printed on it is:
Visit - Marriage/CP From the official UKVI visa endorsements and codes guidance:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/262494/endorsement-and-codes_ecb13.pdfFiancee visa might even make sense from the US because that way the sponsor doesn't have to fly back and forth so in a way this really is down to where you want your ceremony. The only reason to marry first and apply as a spouse is either when both are already in the same country or will be, and no extra flight are involved in getting this done, or if theh applicant has multiple derivatives in which case indeed that route will cost a 1000 quid extra per person.
But if one of you is to fly RT across the atlantic vs extra 1000 quid, really could be either. Nothing else wrong with fiancee visa and many of my clients do get it.
No one said there was anything wrong with fiance visas. It's personal choice as to whether people decide to go that route or not.
We just give new forum members all the information so they can decide whether to marry first apply for a spousal visa, or to apply for a fiance visa and marry in the UK.
For example:
- a spousal visa will allow them to work, study and access the NHS for free immediately, while a fiance visa does not allow any of those things... so that may be a factor in the decision-making process if the applicant wishes to be able to work right away, or doesn't want to have to worry about health insurance and paying for treatment while on their fiance visa.
- applying for a fiance visa means filing and paying for 2 visa applications in the space of a few months, whereas marrying in the US means only having 1 visa to apply for, which means a saving of at least £933 in visa fees and less visa application stress. If the UK sponsor already has plans to fly to the US for a visit, or they can fly over for a similar or cheaper amount than this, then it may benefit them to marry in the US first.
- marrying in the UK is a long-winded process which requires a visa, and various residency/waiting periods between arriving, giving notice and being able to marry, so it can be a tedious process and difficult to plan, whereas if you marry in the US, only an ESTA or visitor visa is needed and the wedding can take place within a few days.