The assessments for the disabled are an entirely separate can of worms, even for the existing benefits. But by rolling it all into one benefit I see it getting even worse, because in the areas of Universal Credit it already is. Its a very dehumanising process riddled with errors.
That's not correct. Only
Income Related ESA will be "
rolling it all into one benefit" called Universal Credit because UC is a low income benefit and therefore is only replacing 6 low income based benefits.
Contribution Based ESA; or New Style ESA as it is now called: is based on the claimants contributions to the UK. This is not a low income benefit and therefore will not be replaced by Universal Credit.
For "the disabled", there is the DLA benefit and it's replacement PIP. These are in work benefits and not low income benefits; therefore these will not be replaced by Universal Credit either.
Income Related ESA already has a time limit and that is nothing to do with Universal Credit. Whereas Contribution Based ESA does not seem to have a time limit because these claimants have been contributing to the UK.
https://www.gov.uk/universal-creditWhat Universal Credit is ...
You may be able to get it if you’re on a low income or out of work....
Universal Credit will replace the following benefits:
Child Tax Credit
Housing Benefit
Income Support
income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA)
income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
Working Tax CreditI have no issues with there being an assessment. At all. The way the UK has gone about it since austerity is the problem. Spend a few days in a group devoted to disabled people and you will understand my concerns.
I spend time with real people who can't work: family and friends. And it’s nothing to do with austerity. Under this system, they reduced the money given to those who will be able to work soon (those in the WRAG group of the ESA benefit) but they can can still claim other low income based benefits if they qualify. They gave more money to those who can't work (those in the Support Group of the ESA benefit). e.g. My nephew now gets more money under these changes and he is one of the many that does not ever need to go to an assessment because sadly, he will never be able to work.
Under the old system a decade ago, people were meant to report when they were better. They still have to under this system, but many now have to attend assessments too and they can thank the abusers for that change.
The same with the appliances money that some were given as extra. Those who need appliances like the new system better because they can now have as many as they need; whereas under the old system they were limited by the appliance money they were given. Those who don't like the new system are those who took that money, but never spent it on appliances as there were no checks.
Most people take out private insurance to avoid claiming benefits if they are sick because these pay more: a percentage of what their salary was. A friend of mine had been sick on a private policy for about 20 years, but even her insurers require her to have assessments.