And, of course, as expected, the UK variant Covid is showing up here in the USA. Colorado has now reported it. I wouldn't be surprised to see it turn up in SoCalif shortly - LA is tanking badly, and my guess is that they'll find it there next. Then most of the other major population centers soon thereafter.
And for the really disturbing news: There was a scientist giving an interview on national tv today who said they don't know if the RNA vaccines will prevent the transmission of Covid. Only that they will greatly lessen the severity of the disease in a vaccinated person should they get it. The guy stated that there is really no data about transmission of the virus after inoculation. So, the vaccine does not necessarily prevent Covid infection and may or may not impact one's ability to pass the virus to another. And they still don't have a clue how long any immunity will last. It looks like the best outcome is that, like a flu shot, if you do get infected you are less likely to have the catastrophic version of Covid. But you could still give it to granny while you were ill. Assuming you even knew you were a carrier. Oh. My.
Umm, they've kind of managed to neglect to mention all that in all the PR campaign.
What I had been hearing was the double-shot sequence was 95% effective. I took that to mean that 95 out of 100 people who had both shots would not get Covid at all. That's not what the guy said today. Hmmm, now which is the accurate message? Is it 95% completely preventative, or 95% you'll get some kind of immunity boost, but no telling how much of one? If it's the former, there shouldn't be any issue about transmitting the disease to others. I'd have thought.
It does still seem better than doing nothing but praying as a means to avoid Covid, yet they do seem to be mis-selling these two particular vaccines to the public, as far as any possible "issues" associated with them. At least, they have been here. The official party line is still that the reactions to the shots are likely to be insignificant - but now they're starting to add in around the edges of media interviews that it's best to plan to possibly take a couple of days off work after your inoculation, just in case you feel unable to work. (Like in case your face swells up, you get intractable nausea, you get the migraine from hell, you have too high a fever, your joints ache too badly, you have massive brain-fog, or half your face stops working - but it's all temporary.
)
There are interviews with people who've had the vaccine starting to pop up. Of course, the more lurid stories will always get the most coverage, but there has to be some fact in them. Many people seem to be reporting no side effects at all (other than a sore arm). Others have reported the migraine of their lives for up to 36 hours straight, or brain fogs that last several days (one woman apparently could not manage to open and cook a packet of Ramen because she was so out-of-it), or severe chills and body aches. And that's just after the first shot.
All of the former side-effects are, of course, definitely preferable to a bad case of Covid, but I'm not as confident about the one where you have to jab an epi-pen into your thigh and then spend time in the ER. ERs are rapidly filling, and they are damned expensive. (As are epi-pens, come to think of it. Not counting the "owwww!" factor there.) I wonder, once there are enough anecdotes floating around about unpleasant side-effects, are people going to wuss out of taking the shot? Or will they go back for the second injection if they feel really lousy after the first one, when the adverse reactions are supposed to be more common after the second injection?
A wonking good case of Bell's Palsy or one's face swelling shut is going to seriously freak people out if they're not told about that possibility in advance. I do think it's a miscalculation by government health officials to think that people are not going to hop immediately onto social media and report to the ether if they have a bad time of it after the injections. Once that train leaves the station, there's no getting it back under control. Consistently doing a PR campaign that says the side effects are "mild" rather than being really candid is almost assuredly going to backfire. People tend to think "mild" means they can just take an aspirin and get on with life. If that is proved untrue, even if it's in a minority of cases, there will be significant mistrust issues arising all the hell over the place. (Oh, well.... I have the sense of a train-wreck in the making, but I'm probably just over-tired.)
I wonder, will the killed virus and other more traditional vaccines not have those side effects? (One can hope that's the case, especially since the non-RNA vaccines don't require the extensive refrigeration and can be gotten to more rural areas where there is not a capability to keep vaccines in the required extremely low temperature conditions.) While it's a moot point for us at present, I think I'm going to wait for one of the other versions of the vaccines rather than accept the RNA ones, when they say I can get a vaccine. I've already seen the Daughter's face swell up once and I don't want to see that again, and I've already ended up on steroids for a year to calm down an over-active immune system that left me with 02 sats in the high 80s (without exertion).
I do wish this nightmare would end soon.
References:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/15/moderna-covid-vaccine-fatigue-headaches-and-muscle-pain-are-the-most-common-side-effects.htmlhttps://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/side-effects-and-covid-19-vaccines-what-to-expect.htmlhttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/12/what-expect-when-you-get-covid-19-vaccine/617428/https://www.govtech.com/em/safety/Coronavirus-Vaccine-Side-Effects-Should-the-Public-be-Concerned.html