About to file e-fasttrack--A few questions!!

So, even though this form looks ridiculously simple compared to US immigration forms, I'm still confused on a couple of points.

I'm married to a UK citizen, and this is the first marriage for both of us. So, for the question "Have you ever been married, or in a relationship like a marriage?" I want to say "Yes" since I am married to him. But do they mean other marriages, or does this one count, too? Same type of question with "Have you ever been engaged to be married?"

I think that's the main stuff that I was confused about. If any experienced settlement applicants can clarify this for me, I'd appreciate it. 

I answered no to those questions and they never asked about them so I guess I was right in my answer.

i have often wondered the same thing.  i will be putting no too.

and good luck!!

It means prior marriages or partnerships that were akin to marriage (ie long-term living together).

I was puzzled over that one as well.  We put "no" -- I was applying for a spousal visa and we had JUST married and had NOT lived together.  It didn't come up in question.

Thanks! I'll now put "No." Another question, although I think I've got this one right...for the question "Will you or your sponsor receive income form any other sources, including friends and family?" I plan on putting "No." His mum will act as our co-sponsor, if necessary, and I have her pay stubs, employer letter, and letter of support, but this is not "income" as such. Am I correct in putting "No" and is there anywhere on the form to indicate that we have a co-sponsor (other than the additional info box)?

Thanks again! Can't wait till it's in my hand!!

Obviously I got those questions wrong, because we were married so I said "yes."  There was no hitch with my application.

Another confusing question was it asked for passport numbers twice.  Can't remember how that was phrased.  So I put my current passport number twice, and then thinking that maybe they wanted to see my most recently expired passport, I mailed that with the packet.  Again, no hitch.

Jim