Here is something people might find useful.
I have been trying to do further research on this and at least attempting to understand the principle of why the UK taxes offshore mutual funds without "distributor status" at "income tax" rates and not capital gains tax rates. My intention is not to criticize the UK, I do realize the US also does the same with PFIC etc, but my interest is in the UK taxation since I live here.
Let me also add that I have no formal qualifications in law or tax law but just trying to make sense of all this. But I do want to raise doubts and share whatever I have learnt in case it is helpful to others. Do feel free to correct me tho'.
The principle of "distributor status" for "offshore funds" seems to be that many offshore funds used to "roll up income" and pass it off as "capital gain" and I understand this is clearly wrong. The investor is getting away with lower rates of CGT when they should have paid income tax. So I understand this part.
But what if the so-called offshore fund is a simple index tracker, much like the FTSE AllShare Index tracker in the UK ? What if this fund distributes / declares all its dividends to the investor ? This is what the Vanguard Total Stock Market index fund (VTSMX) does. Nothing secretive going on here. Yes, dividends are reinvested, but at the end of the year, a statement is sent out declaring all dividends paid. I believe this is the 1099-DIV. I am happy to pay dividend tax rates on this and 18% upon sale, just like I would do in a UK-based index tracker.
I called up one of the people in UK HMRC listed here
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/offshorefunds/dist_fundlist.htm [nofollow] and explained my predicament. I was not trying to move UK funds offshore. This was money I earned in America and it is invested in American mutual funds.
I also told her that Vanguard the company, probably wont bother applying for UK distributor status, since it primarily targets American investors. She replied to me that I have an option as per Page 18, Schedule 27 ICTA 1988, in this case, if I can show that the mutual fund does indeed distribute 85% of its income and does not have more than 5% of its investments in other offshore funds, then I am fine and I will be taxed as if the fund does have distributor status.
I am planning to meet a top expert from the Fry Group on these matters and I will share that info as well.