Was it as simple as requesting your stateside doctor fax your records to your new GP surgery? I would love to go that route.
Eh, pretty much...give or take some bureaucratic B.S., of course. Because of HIPPA, you'll have to fill in and sign some kind of records release/request form, but different hospitals/clinics (or maybe it's a state law thing?) had different procedures. In a couple of cases, I was able to download and print the form off their website, sign it, then scan & e-mail back. But one place wouldn't even email OR mail me the blank form-- they would only fax it to me, and then I had to physically mail it back.
Just be prepared to take a deep breath and roll your eyes a lot when talking with the records admins, who, if possible, are even more pointlessly officious and petty than the average medical receptionist.
But they
do have to provide them, and as long as you're having them sent to another healthcare provider, I don't believe they can charge you for them. (But that, too, could vary from place to place.)
I'm rather concerned about working with a new GP to maintain the current "cocktail" that works for me, or finding super close alternatives. What is this scary sounding NICE protocol?!
NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Basically, it's a body that reviews all the study data, etc., and makes recommendations about the most appropriate 'care pathways' (i.e. diagnostic process & criteria) and treatment protocols for any given condition. For example, here's their Asthma overview:
http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/asthma#content=view-node%3Anodes-diagnosis-and-monitoringGenerally speaking, NICE guidelines will recommend that doctors start with the most 'tried-and-true', clinically reliable treatment first, and will outline what to try 2nd, 3rd, etc., if that doesn't work for an individual patient.
The guidelines usually have some degree of flexibility/discretion built-in, and in any case, doctors don't
have to follow them to the letter. But if they don't, they'll have to be able to explain why. 'The patient was already on this other treatment, and was responding well' is generally a perfectly acceptable explanation. But if you run into a particularly cautious/stressed/lazy/uninformed doc, and especially if that exact, prior treatment isn't available, they might insist on following the NICE outline.
Which isn't necessarily the end of the world. I mean, NICE suggests these things in the first place because they generally work. It only really gets tricky for people who have 'controversial' or lesser-known diagnoses (e.g. ADHD, thyroid problems). Then, you might have to be prepared to argue your case/educate your doctors. And if you get one who just won't listen or work with you, be prepared to look for a different doctor.
So, basically, just like home.
(At least the NICE guidelines are developed by doctors, and not insurance execs!)